WASHINGTON (TIP): American scientists have created in a lab the smallest viable genome existing in nature with just enough essential genes for an organism to function and reproduce on its own, in a major step toward unlocking the mysteries of how life is created.

The synthetic genome of this bacteria, dubbed JCVI-syn3.0, only carries 473 genes, compared to about 20,000 for a human being.

But lead researchers Craig Venter –the first to sequence the human genome — and Clyde Hutchinson and their colleagues have not yet determined the functions of 149 of the genes, about a third of the total.

“Investigators’ first task is to probe the roles of those genes, which promise new insights into the basic biology of life,” said Chris Voigt, a synthetic biologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology who did not participate in the research.

But several potentially homologous genes have been found in other organisms, suggesting they encode universal proteins with functions that for now remain undetermined.

Researchers used a design-build-test process to identify quasi-essential genes, which are required for robust growth but not for life. The study was published in Thursday’s edition of the journal Science.

Through a series of experiments, they obtained a synthetic, reduced genome that was as small as possible because no more genes could be disrupted.

“The only way to answer basic questions about life would be to get to a minimal genome,” Venter explained in a teleconference.

“Probably the only way to do that would be to try to synthesize a genome.”

This pursuit is what led the scientists to turn to Mycoplasma, bacteria with the smallest known genomes of cells that replicate autonomously.

“If you know nothing about airplanes and you’re looking at (a Boeing) 777 and you’re just trying to find out functions of parts by removing them, and you remove the engine from the right wing, the airplane can still fly and land,” Venter explained.

“So you might say that’s a nonessential component and you don’t really discover the essentiality until you remove the second one.

“And that’s what’s happened over and over again in biology where we would have what appeared to be a non-essential component until we removed its counterpart.”